Brief Impressions At the Still Point
By David Eide
"It does not take a majority to prevail...but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men."
Samuel Adams
Some Impressions on Politics
Politics is important because the Constitution makes all the people players.
Franklin's challenge that, "we've given you a Republic if you can keep it," makes
more sense now than 1787. After all, the generations up to the present can say,
"we've kept the Republic going for 220 years. Will the subsequent generations
be able to say the same?"
People
suffer with bad politics. Just go ask the people of New Orleans or
Iraq. Democracy tempers politics to a degree that would have been
admired by many in the past. Words can hurt but those knives and
vials of poison can create generations worth of bloodshed.
The problem is that politics is good only when the critical mass of
people in it have an extensive knowledge of the structure of power,
from the founding document up through all the add-ons, through the
administrations of executive power, to the major crises the government
is called on to solve. Only then can they produce authentic leadership
from themselves rather than leadership that is fabricated out of images,
sound-bites, consultants, and the like.
And without that critical mass of people you lose the republic and gain
an enormous front for criminal activity and neglect of the people who, despite
their self-myth, can not do it all themselves in the modern world.
* * * * * * * *
Politics is never good when the critical mass of people are dumb
and ignorant and the critical mass of politicians ambitious and
savvy. At that moment the democracy is in need of critical care.
* * * * * * * *
In the absence of government many "powers" would fight it out
as they are doing in the vacuum of Iraq.
It's hard to imagine any time or place experiencing an "absence of government."
Thinking like an anarchist may be an excellent, safe way to gain perspective
but I don't think even 40,000 years ago cavemen ran around
without ways and means to distribute power. It seems bred into animals that want to
survive.
Terrible governments are marked by corruption-as-a-way-of-life. It becomes
a necessary habit that is enforced by the bureaucratic will to survive.
This is called, "choking off the lifeblood of the people."
A citizen stands in a specific place. He follows a thread through the local
community, region, state, on up to the federal level. When the thread knots
at one of these places the citizen asks a simple question, "what reality
is this level of government acting on?"
The key to the art of politics is to tie together the abstractions at various levels
of power with the actual experience of human beings. The
people behind the scenes in politics deal with the algorithms of politics
while the politician always tries to connect to the people and share in
their experience. They attempt it or fake it but once there is disconnect
between leadership and the people there is no ability to lead them anywhere.
* * * * * * * *
Katrina proved that the huge bubble at the core of bureaucracy
is significant when incompetent or corrupt.
* * * * * * * *
March 19, 2007
Thank goodness reality is always bigger, tougher, and more enduring than our opinions
about it.
* * * * * * * *
The Republicans are in that place where all baseball teams must go. A few bad seasons,
a few bad decisions and suddenly they are out of the pennant before the All-Star game.
The fans boo and start going to women's basketball games. The real fans expect the team to strip themselves of the debacle and re-make
the team from the bottom-up. "To the bottom you go. You are going to see interesting
things at the bottom, Republicans. Some things will terrify you, some will turn on the
juices of exploitation again. But, you will not return until you regain your credibility
that has been destroyed by the Iraq fiasco."
So saith some law of political justice.
* * * * * * * *
How come men who tried to kill each other in war, later on embrace as old men and talk about
peace? But politicos never resolve and are bitter to the end? War is the final act of politics
and if politics fails to become war the actors are frustrated, unrequited. That's only a guess.
* * * * * * * *
Eventually the domestic scene in politics centers on poverty.
Poverty and the environmental concerns may clash; may not. The
environmental problems are certainly more articulated these days with global warming
dancing in the minds of anyone who goes out into the open air.
The concern for poverty seems way on the back-burner. One but
not the only reason is that the middle-class disconnected
from the question when poverty was radicalized and racialized.
Throw the pc crowd in there to do everything possible to prevent
students from taking on middle-class values and there is a regular
piss-pot of disinterest among the propertied class.
That is, the class that
confers the final value on political ideas.
Here's what has to happen.
- Liberal thinkers have to assert that poverty transcends race
and gender.
- The goal of poverty-policy is to move poor people into the
middle-class, with middle-class values and expectations. It is not
to "radicalize" the poor and their supporters.
- The middle-class must be convinced that policies will enhance
the power of the middle-class to deal with a much more militant,
almost imperial wealthy class that won't even fight in their war for
"survival."
- When the middle-class has a mighty shift in this direction, away
from wealth and towards poverty, politicians will be jumping like
hungry rabbits to lead them.
* * * * * * * *
The Democrats are in danger of losing a lot of credibility with
their call for troop "phase out." They are trying to deal
with an irrational act by being "rational" but all they do is
expose themselves to the fact their unreality is on par with the unreality
of the Republican party. When I look at each party I see two fuzzy-wuzzy
animals that don't have a clue when it comes to war and conflict.
Iraq has become another quintessential war of politics and that
means failure. Not that it's bad that politics is involved, obviously,
but that truth-telling and fact-finding become impossible. Violent opinions
sift through each other and "something" is resolved. Meanwhile, on the field
of battle, complete disaster.
The key to winning a conflict is leadership. All else is irrelevant.
Most genuine citizens have called Bush a failed leader.
The Republicans were chastised by the mid-term election of last year and
should be held over the burning coals in 2008. The Democrats have to play it
right down the middle.
The ultimate burden of responsibility belongs with Bush and his
administration. Let the policy attain whatever level of success
or failure it's going to. The Democrats, by rushing so ferociously
into the vacuum of the Bush administration, could be trapped by what
they are saying, especially about "phased withdrawal," which means
what? We could very well witness a repeat of the tragic events after
the end of the Vietnam war when southeast Asia became a killing
field.
Democrats have to convince the people they are not "isolationists."
And there are more than a few people who want the rest of the world to go
away so they can engage in the innocuous sports they do. "Why can't we
just play? Don't we pay taxes? Leave us alone! I don't want to think about
the future."
So it goes, as the novelist said.
March 14, 2007
A Few Impressions of American Culture
Two enormous changes have marked this epoch in American
history. For one, the economy now produces "surplus," rather than
scarcity. It's not that money grows on trees but that Americans
expect to live fairly well by just showing up. This is markedly
different than the historic scarcity that sharply divided the roles
between the genders and allowed for the development of two qualities
now missing from American life: Deferral of gratification and sacrifice.
In fact, the military is about the only institution where these
attributes survive and last I looked there isn't an overwhelming
desire on the part of young people to join up.
The second change is that no one and nothing in American experience
prepared us for the role of "worlds only superpower." Psychologically
this demands an end to the small-town, sentimental qualities that
has marked American culture and to something that is rather ancient
and calculating and less than ideal.
It's the idealism of democracy
and its conscience versus the realpolitic of a world not-America.
This change is vented off and expressed in a number of ways, in and
out of popular culture. The real question is if this huge contradiction
eviscerate the heart and soul of the people.
The people are sometimes disciplined by economic necessity. It can be a
gravitational force that keeps things rolling onward. Stray from
this force and ye will be eradicated like a meteor trying to reach
the surface of Earth. It seems that way for anyone who has had to scratch to
survive. The problem with this universal experience is that it tends to produce
bitter, cynical, and intolerant people.
Somehow
America has to produce self-disciplined people who are open to new
knowledge, new things and new experience. Maybe the future depends on the art of this.
* * * * * * * *
We are a better society because of the civil rights movement.
We have learned that respect for other people is the first rung on
the ladder to a civil society. We have embraced the voice of rightness
and reason that wants all people and every single person to fulfill
their potential and empty that back into the society that belongs to
all. It was not a smooth road.
Every man has his pride. One of the arts of life is to maintain
and nurture the pride while negotiating through the demands of
the larger society.
A free man or woman uses the resources that are available only so
new and better resources will develop. This takes patience and
knowledge to fully manifest itself.
* * * * * * * *
Where is the resolution between "morality" as we understand the
term and "bigness" "hugeness" and effects never experienced on
planet Earth? The character of the people and of a whole epoch hinges on that
question.
February 28, 2007
Back to Sunoasis Opinions
Click here to send your comments
on what you read here.
Previous Events:
Post-election 2004
Election 2004
On Political Culture
On the Debates
War on Terrorism
The California Recall
The Progressive Era
What is a perfect President?
On Political Culture
On JFK Assassination
The Clinton Bubble
The state of things
IRAQ
Affirmative
Action
Liberals
and Nuders
The
Trent Lott Affair
Why
the Democrats are in Trouble
The Uncertain Decade
Back to Media Resource page
eide491@earthlink.net
copyright 2007